SHARE
Facebook X Pinterest WhatsApp

3 Reasons Why AI in Commissioning, Qualification, and Validation Matters Now

thumbnail
3 Reasons Why AI in Commissioning, Qualification, and Validation Matters Now

AI in CQV is gaining momentum because the pressures on the industry are immediate. Manufacturing must scale faster.

Written By
thumbnail
Siva Samy
Siva Samy
Jan 15, 2026

Commissioning, qualification, and validation (CQV) have long formed the backbone of life sciences manufacturing. Whether in traditional pharma, biologics, or advanced therapies, CQV ensures that systems operate as intended and that patients receive safe, reliable therapies. But today’s manufacturing landscape looks radically different from the one CQV frameworks were built for.

Production floors are becoming increasingly automated. Data volumes are exploding. Regulators expect continuous oversight rather than episodic verification. In this environment, AI has quickly moved from an emerging concept to an essential tool. Not because AI replaces the principles of validation, but because it helps them evolve in step with modern manufacturing.

AI’s Role in CQV

Across facilities, three major shifts are making AI indispensable to CQV today.

1. AI Turns Static Validation Documents into Dynamic, Living Intelligence

For decades, validation engineers have written protocols from scratch or heavily edited templates for each system or asset. Even in semi-digital environments, engineers spent countless hours gathering requirements, interpreting technical details, and manually constructing test steps. The result was slow, inconsistent, and often, the focus was on repetitive work, and time was spent authoring documents rather than assessing quality.

AI changes this paradigm entirely. With systems now able to pull standardized data, historical information, and risk assessments into a unified knowledge base, protocols can be generated dynamically to match the exact configuration of the equipment being qualified. Requirements, risks, and design elements flow automatically into structured instructions.

This shift does much more than accelerate documentation. It eliminates unnecessary variation in how protocols are written and ensures alignment across teams. Instead of two engineers producing widely different protocols for similar assets, both pull from a consistent and validated dataset.

More importantly, AI introduces adaptability. When a requirement changes, protocols update automatically and in real time. What once took hours of cross-checking can now occur instantly, dramatically reducing the risk of missing critical updates as digital systems, sensors, and automation evolve on the manufacturing floor.

As facilities integrate more robotics, digital sensors, and distributed control systems, this dynamic intelligence is necessary.

2. AI Reduces Human Error and Strengthens Real-Time Decision Making

Life sciences manufacturing operates under stringent controls, where even minor documentation errors can lead to rework, delays, or regulatory scrutiny. Traditional CQV processes, which are often manual and paper-heavy, are particularly susceptible to these risks.

AI minimizes the burden by embedding intelligence directly into both protocol development and execution. During document creation, AI flags missing requirements, inconsistent references, or misaligned test steps. During execution, it alerts users to out-of-range values, incomplete entries, or unexpected sequences.

This matters most in 24/7 manufacturing environments where multiple shifts and engineering teams rotate through critical tasks. AI provides consistent oversight regardless of who is executing the work, ensuring continuity and reducing variability in data quality.

These capabilities are also key to enabling real-time validation readiness. Historically, issues such as equipment drift or marginal process performance may have gone unnoticed until scheduled reviews. With AI analyzing trends continuously, subtle shifts can be detected long before they become deviations. Engineers can determine whether a variation reflects natural behavior or emerging risk and intervene earlier.

The result is a validation practice that is proactive rather than reactive. Teams spend less time fixing errors and more time understanding what the data is telling them about process performance, system reliability, and product quality.

3. AI Enables Continuous Traceability and Lifecycle Intelligence

Traceability sits at the heart of regulated manufacturing. Auditors expect clear, defensible connections between requirements, risks, tests, results, and decisions. Maintaining this level of visibility across hundreds of documents and thousands of data points is challenging even in the best circumstances and nearly impossible as systems grow more interconnected.

AI simplifies this challenge by creating automated linkages throughout the validation lifecycle. When a requirement is added or changed, AI identifies all affected protocols, test steps, and evidence. When a deviation occurs, the system can help map potential root causes across related assets or historical patterns.

Over time, this builds a transparent, interconnected validation record and not a fragmented stack of documents, but a living dataset that reflects the full operational history of each system.

This intelligence supports true risk-based validation. When deep traceability exists, teams can anticipate where issues are likely to emerge based on asset history, process behavior, or similar equipment. AI can surface these insights before commissioning even begins, helping teams refine test strategies and focus on high-risk areas.

This is the foundation of continuous verification. And as regulators begin emphasizing data-driven oversight and real-time visibility, AI-powered CQV will become an expectation rather than an exception.

See also: Enabling High-Value Use Cases for Industrial Agentic AI Automation

Advertisement

The Road Ahead

AI in CQV is gaining momentum because the pressures on the industry are immediate. Manufacturing must scale faster. Therapies must reach patients sooner. Systems must stay continuously validated in environments where data flows constantly between previously isolated platforms.

AI strengthens every part of the CQV mission. It improves efficiency, reduces errors, accelerates documentation, and enables more meaningful oversight. Teams report faster protocol development, fewer deviations, and shorter review cycles. Engineers can focus on analysis and decision-making rather than administrative tasks.

Most importantly, AI enhances the purpose of validation, which is to ensure that quality is built into every step of production.

As facilities modernize and regulators evolve expectations around digital maturity, AI will become the connective tissue that links design, commissioning, qualification, and ongoing performance monitoring. CQV professionals will shift from document authors to data-driven strategists. Validation will become continuous, intelligent, and deeply integrated into daily operations.

AI in CQV matters now because manufacturing cannot wait. The complexity of modern systems demands new tools that bring clarity, speed, and foresight to the processes that protect product quality and patient safety.

thumbnail
Siva Samy

Siva Samy is the CEO of ValGenesis. Before founding the company, Dr. Siva Samy held several technical and management positions at various biotech, pharmaceutical, and medical device companies in the fields of validation and Information technology. He has been credited with over fifteen research articles and holds a patent on ‘Validating and Maintaining Respective Validation Status of Software Applications, Manufacturing Systems and Business Processes' by USPTO, and received a master’s degree in Analytical Chemistry, a Ph.D. in Medical Devices, and a post-doctoral from the University of Madras and University of Toronto.

Recommended for you...

MCP Isn’t the Answer, It’s the Question
Matt McLarty
Jan 14, 2026
Why Test Automation Doesn’t Always Achieve What QA Teams Expect, and How to Move the Needle
Rohit Raghuvansi
Jan 13, 2026
Real-time Analytics News for the Week Ending January 10
Model-as-a-Service Part 1: The Basics

Featured Resources from Cloud Data Insights

The Manual Migration Trap: Why 70% of Data Warehouse Modernization Projects Exceed Budget or Fail
The Difficult Reality of Implementing Zero Trust Networking
Misbah Rehman
Jan 6, 2026
Cloud Evolution 2026: Strategic Imperatives for Chief Data Officers
Why Network Services Need Automation
RT Insights Logo

Analysis and market insights on real-time analytics including Big Data, the IoT, and cognitive computing. Business use cases and technologies are discussed.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.