SHARE
Facebook X Pinterest WhatsApp

How Should Governments Measure AI Readiness?

thumbnail
How Should Governments Measure AI Readiness?

AI in action

Before developing any military AI system, the U.S. government should have plans to address data silos, security, accessibility, and change management.

Written By
thumbnail
David Curry
David Curry
Aug 19, 2019

The use of artificial intelligence for military purposes has concerned many experts and activists, who see the technology as a new superweapon for global powers to use against their enemies.

Some, including Elon Musk’s OpenAI, the co-founders of Google subsidiary DeepMind, and Skype founder Jaan Tallinn, have signed a declaration promising not to develop robotic weaponry for any government.

SEE ALSO: Real-Time Analytics in Big, “Brutal” Environments

While this may dent the progression of militarized AI for a few years, China and Russia both have internal projects for AI development. The U.S., through DARPA, is working on similar technologies.

According to Brigham Bechtel, chief strategy officer for MarkLogic, the U.S. government should look into four areas before developing any military AI system.

The first is data silos, a common issue in the business world. Unstructured data without any context or metadata attached, locked inside a department silo, could be of critical use to another department. Without modern databases and analytics tools, and a centralized location for the AI to discover all this data, the algorithm may miss key information.

In an age where foreign powers regularly test cyber defence, data security is paramount. Bechtel said it needs to go beyond simply securing the data behind a perimeter, the data needs to be incorruptible and non-removable. Full data encryption, levels of control within the department and organization, and anonymization are identified as three main ways of enforcing data security.

Adding to the point that data needs to be incorruptible, there also needs to be a record of when data has been changed, when and by who. This is imperative for governments that coalesce large amounts of data, and may not be able to verify if the data has changed without computer verification.

The last area is data accessibility. According to Bechtel, governments need to be able to view mission critical data in real-time, to provide an up-to-date intelligence picture. For missions that may involve moving targets, having the latest intel could make a huge difference, especially if an AI is making judgements based on the data it is receiving.

thumbnail
David Curry

David is a technology writer with several years experience covering all aspects of IoT, from technology to networks to security.

Recommended for you...

5 Defining AI and Real-Time Intelligence Shifts of 2025
Why Your AI Pilot Is Stuck in Purgatory; And What to Do About It
AI Infrastructure Services: Banking and Financial Services’ New Foundation for Computing
Ratan Saha
Dec 16, 2025
Real-time Analytics News for the Week Ending December 13

Featured Resources from Cloud Data Insights

Why Network Services Need Automation
The Shared Responsibility Model and Its Impact on Your Security Posture
The Role of Data Governance in ERP Systems
Sandip Roy
Nov 28, 2025
What Is Sovereign AI? Why Nations Are Racing to Build Domestic AI Capabilities
RT Insights Logo

Analysis and market insights on real-time analytics including Big Data, the IoT, and cognitive computing. Business use cases and technologies are discussed.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2025 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.