How Should Governments Measure AI Readiness?

Before developing any military AI system, the U.S. government should have plans to address data silos, security, accessibility, and change management.

Written By
David Curry
David Curry
Published: Aug 19, 2019
Updated: Aug 22, 2019
2 minute read
government ai readiness

<p>AI in action</p>

The use of artificial intelligence for military purposes has concerned many experts and activists, who see the technology as a new superweapon for global powers to use against their enemies.

Some, including Elon Musk’s OpenAI, the co-founders of Google subsidiary DeepMind, and Skype founder Jaan Tallinn, have signed a declaration promising not to develop robotic weaponry for any government.

SEE ALSO: Real-Time Analytics in Big, “Brutal” Environments

While this may dent the progression of militarized AI for a few years, China and Russia both have internal projects for AI development. The U.S., through DARPA, is working on similar technologies.

According to Brigham Bechtel, chief strategy officer for MarkLogic, the U.S. government should look into four areas before developing any military AI system.

The first is data silos, a common issue in the business world. Unstructured data without any context or metadata attached, locked inside a department silo, could be of critical use to another department. Without modern databases and analytics tools, and a centralized location for the AI to discover all this data, the algorithm may miss key information.

In an age where foreign powers regularly test cyber defence, data security is paramount. Bechtel said it needs to go beyond simply securing the data behind a perimeter, the data needs to be incorruptible and non-removable. Full data encryption, levels of control within the department and organization, and anonymization are identified as three main ways of enforcing data security.

Adding to the point that data needs to be incorruptible, there also needs to be a record of when data has been changed, when and by who. This is imperative for governments that coalesce large amounts of data, and may not be able to verify if the data has changed without computer verification.

The last area is data accessibility. According to Bechtel, governments need to be able to view mission critical data in real-time, to provide an up-to-date intelligence picture. For missions that may involve moving targets, having the latest intel could make a huge difference, especially if an AI is making judgements based on the data it is receiving.

David Curry

David Curry is a tech journalist and analyst with over a decade of experience writing for established outlets. He holds a master’s degree in International Journalism from the University of Leeds and has covered the technology sector since the early 2010s. His work focuses on B2B technology, data journalism, mobile apps and app markets, artificial intelligence, digital platforms, and emerging technologies. He earned a BA from the University of Lincoln and an MA from the University of Leeds.

Featured Resources from Cloud Data Insights

Journify Raises $12M Series A Amid 5x Growth
TechnologyWire
Nov 3, 2026
Real-time Analytics News for the Week Ending October 31
Why AI Is Exposing Your Company’s Biggest Knowledge Problem
Nithin Mummaneni
Oct 29, 2026
Real-time Analytics News for the Week Ending October 24
RT Insights Logo

Analysis and market insights on real-time analytics including Big Data, the IoT, and cognitive computing. Business use cases and technologies are discussed.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.