When Sensors Don’t Make Sense: Ridiculous IoT Devices

IoT devices

We need evaluation criteria for IoT devices.

Now that IoT is all the rage, venture capitalists and crowds of innovators have rushed into the space. This has already produced some pretty innovative IoT devices, such as the Nest thermostat and connected cars. However, there has been some pretty dumb stuff as well, such as the now infamous smart egg tray (pictured below), which “syncs with your smartphone to tell you how many eggs you’ve got at home (up to 14) and when they’re going bad.”

Kohler's Bluetooth-enabled toilet features ambient lighting, music streaming, and emergency flush during power outages.

Kohler’s Bluetooth-enabled toilet features ambient lighting, music streaming, and emergency flush during power outages.

The reality is, just because we can put sensors in things and communicate the data, does not mean we should. Indeed, the list of the ridiculous is getting longer, including WiFi-enabled diapers and Bluetooth-enabled toilets.

There are some criteria that we should use when we decide that it’s a good idea to network-enable everything. It needs to be useful — meaning it solves a clear and existing problem that’s difficult to solve without IoT. Moreover, it needs to be pertinent. I mean, how hard is it to look in your fridge to see how many eggs you have left?

Putting Sense Into IoT Devices

IoT devices

A “smart” egg tray.

There is an obligation from those who are innovating in this space to put some thought behind what they are doing. If we try to connect to every device, or thing, then IoT will actually make our lives more complex. We’ll be so ill-equipped to deal with information coming from these devices that we’ll quickly become data-saturated.

There’s also is the issue of data sense. IoT is not about embedding sensors in things, and connecting them to the network. It’s about making sense of the gigabytes of data these devices spin off, and automating responses to that data. This includes the ability for jet-engines to report problems well before failure, or a sensor that can pick up an increasing level of CO2 before it becomes critical. In other worlds, this can be life saving stuff, and it should not be taken lightly.

So, my assertion is that we should all consider a specific set of criteria before IoT-enabling anything. This includes asking the following questions:

  • Does this solve an existing problem, and can humans benefit?
  • Are there manual alternatives that are just as effective?
  • Is the use of the technology cost-effective?
  • Is data being consumed that will provide us with a deeper understanding of the activity?

It’s not much to ask for, but I suspect we’ll see more ridiculousness in the IoT space. The market will normalize as we push back on the things that don’t need to be connected. This will hopefully divert the innovation to different and more productive directions. We need to focus on real problems, guys.

Want more? Check out our most-read content:

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence for the IoT: White Paper
The Value of Bringing Analytics to the Edge
What’s Behind the Attraction to Apache Spark
IoT Hacking: Three Ways Data and Devices Are Vulnerable

Liked this article? Share it with your colleagues!


David Linthicum

About David Linthicum

With more than 13 books on computing and 3,000 published articles, David has shown businesses how to use resources more productively and innovate constantly (full bio). Reach him on twitter @DavidLinthicum.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *